Nikon D5200 vs D7100

Nikon D5200 vs D7100 : Which Should You Buy?

The Nikon D5200 outclasses any Canon camera in its price range, at least for the time being. It is faster, with a better AF system and image sensor than any of the “Rebel” series cameras, and in many ways surpasses even the (admittedly out-dated) Canon 60D, making it the obvious choice for most photography enthusiasts. Unfortunately, the choice is not so easy when the new Nikon D7100 enters the discussion. Which one is right for you? Below, I’ll compare the most significant differences.

Nikon D5200 vs D7100: What’s the Difference?

To begin with, we can take a look at the most significant specs for the D5200 and the D7100. I’ve also included those of the Nikon D7000, a camera that has been exceedingly popular with amateur and professional photographers alike for the past few years.

ModelNikon D5200Nikon D7100Nikon D7000
Price (body)
$696 $579.95
Price (with 18-105 kit lens)
3/15/2013
$1096$1496$1096
Body MaterialPlasticPartial Magnesium Alloy Frame, PlasticPartial Magnesium Alloy Frame, Plastic
Sensor Resolution24.1 Megapixels
(Toshiba)
24.1 Megapixels
(Toshiba)
16 Megapixels
(Sony)
Anti-Aliasing Filter
(Reduces sharpness, prevents moire)
YESNOYES
ISO Range100-6400
+12800
+25600
100-6400
+12800
+25600
100-6400
+12800
+25600
Total AF Points395139
Cross-Type AF Points9159
AF Motor In Body
(For Using Older AF Lenses)
NOYESYES
AF Light Level Range-1 to +19 EV-2 to +19 EV-1 to +19 EV
Autofocus Fine Tuning
Adjustments
NOYESYES
Shutter Speed Range1/4000th - 30 sec.
+bulb
1/8000th - 30 sec.
+bulb
1/8000th - 30 sec.
+bulb
Expected Shutter Life100,000 Shots150,000 Shots150,000 Shots
Max Frame Rate5 fps6 fps
(7 shots in 1.3x crop mode)
6 fps
Max RAW Burst
(buffer size)
8 shots, compressed 14-bit7 shots lossless 12-bit
6 shots lossless 14-bit
11 shots lossless 12-bit
10 shots lossless 14-bit
Max JPG Burst
(fine, Large)
35 3331
Flash Sync Speed1/200th sec.1/250th sec.
(1/320th* sec, or slower,)
1/250th sec.
Wireless Flash
(Built-in Commander)
NOYESYES
Auto FP Flash Mode
(High Speed Sync)
NOYESYES
Media Slots1 SD / SDHC / SDXC2 SD / SDHC / SDXC2 SD / SDHC / SDXC
LCD Size3.0"
921,000 pixels
3.2"
1,228,800 pixels
3.0"
921,000 pixels
LCD ArticulatedYesNoNo
Body Weight505g (no battery)
555 g (with battery)
675 (no battery)690g (no battery)
780g (with battery)
Battery Life500 shots
CIPA Standards
950 shots
CIPA Standards
1050 shots
CIPA Standards
Viewfinder Coverage95% Frame
.78x Magnification
100% Frame
.94x Magnification
100% Frame
.95x Magnification
Video CodecMPEG-4 / H.264
.mov
MPEG-4 / H.264
.mov
MPEG-4 / H.264
.mov
Video Resolutions1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30, 25, 24 fps)
1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps)
640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)
1920 x 1080 (60i*, 50i*, 30, 25, 24 fps)
1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps)
640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)

*only in 1.3x crop mode
1920 x 1080 (24fps)
1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24 fps)
PAL or NTSC
Video Length Limit29 min 59 sec.29 min 59 sec.About 20 Minutes
Headphone JackNoYesNo
Internal MicStereoStereoMono

.

Build Quality

Perhaps the most obvious difference between the D7100 and the D5200 is in their construction. The D5200 is smaller and lighter, with a body made entirely of polycarbonate, while the D7100 is heavier and built for durability, with a metal (magnesium alloy) back and top.  Since the D5200 also uses a smaller battery, the carry-around weight of the D7100 is about 30% more than the D5200.

Whether this is an advantage or disadvantage depends on your photographic needs; some photographers (especially those with larger hands) prefer a larger camera with some ‘heft’ to it, while others prefer something more lightweight and easy to carry around, especially travelers and hikers. Needless to say, those who work in harsh conditions will also prefer the D7100’s weather sealing and heavier-duty construction, as a matter of practicality.

The Sensor : Lack of AA Filter Probably Not Significant

The success of the D800e may have led directly to Nikon’s decision to produce an APS-C camera without an anti-aliasing (AA) filter, but whatever led to the fact, the D7100’s sensor is naked.  Before the D800e, all of the major SLRs produced their sensors with an AA filter: essentially an extra layer in front of the sensor that blurs the image slightly, in order to reduce the jagged edges and moire that have traditionally been associated with digital capture. With modern improvements in image processing software, though, Nikon was confident that the moire and jaggies could be avoided without the AA filter, so they opted to remove it and allow the cameras to capture finer image detail.

Comparisons of images produced by the D800 (AA Filter) and D800e (no AA Filter) have shown that the principle works; there are subtle improvements in fine detail in the D800e’s images. However, we should not expect such significant improvements in the D7100’s images. The receptors on the 24 megapixel sensor of the D7100 are already much, much smaller than those of the D800e. In fact, the D7100 fits about 56% more pixels into the same sensor area than the D800e

1 Further details and measurements can be found on DigicamDB.

.

Why does that matter? Even with the much larger receptors of the D800, lens resolution has become a serious bottle-neck for image quality

2 See this DxO Mark article for further details.

. The dramatically higher pixel density of Nikon’s 24 megapixel sensors will tax lens resolution even more, meaning that the D7100’s images won’t get much sharper unless lenses get sharper first.

So, it is reasonable to expect that the center portion of images taken with the D7100 and your best lenses will show slight improvements in fine detail compared to the D5200, but don’t expect much more… and that is assuming that you’re using a tripod and other best-practices for maximizing sharpness.

Auto Focus Systems

Unlike most entry and mid-level SLRs, the Nikon D5200 has a very sophisticated autofocus system. While cameras like the Canon T4i and 60D have 9 autofocus points, the D5200 has 39, though only 9 of them are cross-type

3 If you don’t know why cross-type points are so important, I recommend watching the first half of our Photography Notes video

.  As you can see from the chart above, this autofocus system, which also incorporates color information, has been adopted from the Nikon D7000.

The D7100, however, shares the same AF system with the flagship Nikon D4 and the D800: 51 AF points, including 15 cross-type… the best system available in a Nikon body.

For all but the most dedicated action photographers, the system in the D5200 (and D7000) will be more than sufficient, even if you’re buying a camera primarily for shooting sports. If your paycheck, however, is going to depend on your focusing system, the extra several hundred dollars will be well spent on the D7100.

D7100 vs d5200 back
Matthew Gore | Light And Matter

Speed

When it comes to speed, the differences between the D5200 and D7100 are more modest that you might expect. The D7100 does have a top shutter speed that is one full f-stop faster than the D5200’s (ie, 1/8000th vs 1/4000th). When it comes to shooting bursts of photos, though, the D7100 only provides an additional frame per second over the D5200’s 5 fps (unless you’re shooting in 1.3x crop mode, in which case it will give up an additional frame per second).

More importantly, though, the under-sized buffer in the D7100 does not allow longer bursts than the D5200; in fact, the D5200 comes out on top in this case. While the D5200 can shoot bursts of 8 RAW (or 35 JPG) shots, the D7100 can only shoot 7 RAW (33 JPG) before the buffer is full. Compare this to the 15 RAW shots allowed by a Canon 60D or 25 in a 7D4 with the most recent firmware upgrade. Originally, the 7D also shot about 15 RAW frames before filling the buffer , and it will be clear that neither Nikon is probably ideal for photographers who rely on the machine-gun method of action photography.

Overhead, Nikon D7100 and D5200
Matthew Gore | Light And Matter

The D5200’s Downfall

Flash. With the popularity of “Strobist” techniques over the past several years, flash photography has become increasingly important to amateur and semi-pro photographers, and this is where the D5200 falls short: it lacks high-speed-sync (Auto FP Flash, henceforth AFP) and external flash control with the built-in flash. External flash control may not be a big deal; many of us prefer to use radio-units instead… though the built-in IR system can be very useful with Nikon’s Creative Lighting System (CLS).

The lack of AFP, however, is a serious problem. Consider this situation: you’re shooting a portrait outdoors during the day, and you want to use a large aperture to blur the background… perhaps f/2 or f/1.4 . This will push your shutter speed beyond 1/1000ths of a second, much higher than the camera’s 1/200th sec. maximum sync speed. So, if you want to use a flash to soften the shadows or create a catch-light in the eyes of your subject, forget it: the flash will not sync. The same is true if you want to use flash for sports and a high shutter speed, and while you can purchase external command modules or radio transmitters for off-camera-flashes, there’s nothing you can buy to work around the lack of AFP. You’d need to buy the D7100 instead.

All the Little Things

There are a few other assorted differences that deserve mention here, but they’re mostly the same differences that we saw between the D5100 and D7000. First, the D5200 does not have an autofocus motor built into the camera body, so it will not be compatible with the full range of (old school) Nikon lenses, while the D7100 does posses the motor. And speaking of “focus”, the D7100 is capable of micro adjustments to correct for front or back-focus problems on lenses, while the D5200 is not.

As should be obvious from the images above, the D5200 has an articulated LCD screen, which some people find helpful for ground-level shots and video but others find a breakage hazard or amateurish. The D7100, on the other hand, has a slightly larger LCD at 3.2 instead of 3.0 diagonal inches.

Finally, if you are interested in video, the D7100 has been given a headphone jack for monitoring audio while you shoot. The jack is absent in the D5200 (and D7000).

Which to Buy?

The Nikon D5200 is a great camera, and I’d recommend it for most amateur photographers except for those who need superior flash capabilities.

To summarize, you should buy the D5200 if you:

  • want a great, all-around camera
  • shoot primarily with natural light or studio strobes
  • have smaller hands, or need the lightest body while maintaining high performance
  • need an articulated LCD screen for video or photos

Buy the D7100 if you:

  • are hard on your equipment and need a more durable body
  • use flash for action or fill and need high-speed sync
  • use Nikon’s CLS and want to use the built-in command module
  • have first-rate lenses and shoot images that depend on the sharpest detail
  • shoot macro (or other focus critical work) and need to make micro adjustments to your lenses
  • shoot a lot of video and want a simple headphone jack on your camera

For the sake of simplicity I’ve tried to focus on only the differences that, in my experience, will actually be important. There are, of course, numerous differences between the two cameras, though, and some features may be more important to particular photographers.
If you think that I’ve left out something important, please feel free to let me know.

Please Comment!

If you have additional questions or comments, please let me know, below. I’ll do what I can to answer questions and clear up any confusion.

Finally, if you have found this article useful, please support us by following one of our links if you decide to buy a camera. It will cost you nothing, but will help support additional independent, unbiased comparisons such as this. You can buy from Amazon here for the D5200 and D7100, or B&H Photo here for the D5200 and D7100.

Editor-in-Chief
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

201 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve P

Thanks very much for this useful comparison. For me, one of the most important differentiators between the two models is the 100% pentaprism viewfinder in the D7100 (and D7000). It has always baffled me that manufacturers
provide anything less at the point where the camera and photographer connect, even on so-called budget models.
Cheers, Steve.

Kyndel

Very fine review, but the LCD in the D5200 will problably do it for me.

I have the D5100 and love the LCD.

EVERY camera should have that – also the pros (I have the D3x and miss it there) – it is so convinient for shooting in strange angles and on tripod, and it is possibly to make it “strong” even for pro work.

For video it is nearly mandatory.

Nima

Hi, thanks for the great article. I am particularly interested in HDR photography, can you please compare these cameras for that purpose?

Janina

Thanks a lot, this comparison is what I needed for my final decision.

Odusseus

Hi,
Thanks for the article it was very clear, better than all of what I have sen before on the web.
I had two questions.
Would you say that there is a difference in the video mode between the 7100 and 5200? I used the 7000 for video and was quite satisfied with it. Should I expect something equivalent with the 5200 (or better?).
And finally, with the 50/60fps video mode, could you say that we could shoot proper slow motion?

Thanks in advance.

alex

I used both D5200 and D7000 for shooting and recording a video at a wedding. Video quality in the D5200 was much more better, specially if you sharpen the images in post.

Stephen

I’m trying to decide between these exact two cameras. I use to shoot professionally 20 years ago when i was young. Digital cameras were just beginning to come out then. I don’t have any old lenses to use. I want a fresh start with a new camera. The camera will be used primary to take pictures of my girlfriend using natural light or lighting i control in the studio. I like things simple. Also what is the maximum size SD card i can use? I have 128 GB cards, but the Macintosh only supports 32 GB cards. DO you have a recommendation for a zoom lens?

ram

Now the price of D7000 is same as d5200 . Is d7000 better than d5200?

Steve Solomon

Matthew, your comments are right on! Having come from a Pentax K-5 system (which I was quite happy with until I noticed some “flakiness” with the electronics), to the Nikon D5200 and some nice Nikkor optics (16-85 and 35 f/1.8), I can say that the D5200 does put out some VERY high-quality, low noise, high dynamic range, and SHARP images! (If interested in seeing example jpegs, please check out my stock photography site. The Aruba and New Jersey images were all taken with the Nikon. True, the D7100 is much more robust (and necessarily heavier) and more feature-laden, however, I don’t believe one could differentiate between images taken with each camera, at least at low ISO, all other things being equal. Perhaps the ONLY 2 features I miss on the D5200 are the AF Fine Tune function (though with “good” calibrated glass, it is superfluous), and the Commander Mode for off-camera flash, though that could be mitigated somewhat if you had 2 Nikon SB-700 Speedlights. Then, I think one of them on camera could act as a “Commander” for the off-camera flash. Great reviews as usual, sir!

Ram

Matthew, Steve

Thank you for sharing your analysis.

Donal McEnroe

Thanks for the very relevant comparisons between the D5200 and D7100. The D5200 suits my needs (and budget) much better!

ronald ancheta

Dear Mr. Matthew,

Thank you for your brilliant review on this camera. I am just a little concerned about its down fall — the lack of high-speed-sync where you cited in a situation: “shooting a portrait outdoors during the day and want to use a large aperture to blur the background…” My question is, how can I possibly compensate this limitation? Is blurring the background be made possible by the use of another type of lens? I am a beginner and I am planning to purchase my first DSLR. I am considering Nikon D5200 as my best choice. Glad to hear from you soon. THANK YOU.
– Ronald

Edwin

Hi mathewis there any device that can break the max speed sync 1/200 of nikon d5200, can the phottix odin wireless triggering system will so the trick? thanks for your awesome review. god bless

Edwin

Thanks Mathew, more power. GOD BLESS

rams

Will 4 stops Neutral Density filter help in that case? Please advise…

Gee

By far one of the BEST photog reviews I have ever read. Completely succint and relevant to all my concerns.

Angus Shepherd

Thanks for a great article. You’ve introduced ideas that matter to a discussion rather than focusing upon the fine details that really won’t make a jot of difference to most peoples’ camera skills.
Little things that are overlooked elsewhere include the internal/lens-drive motor issue which would make a couple of my lenses redundant.
And whether it has Wi-Fi or not does little to make me choose one over another (Almost an argument on another page).
I guess when it comes down to speed of achieving focus, that’s mainly with the lens.
Might be the 7000 for me!

Alaa

do the D7100 have faster AF than the D5200 or both the same speed?
for photographing a running horse toward me like in this photo
<img src=”http://sphotos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/555288_365101180212764_921836109_n.jpg”>

Jeff Pulver

Great article. You did a great job of netting out the key differences in a tight, easy to absorb summary. Very helpful, thanks!

John

Hi Matthew,
Just so that I am sure about that… you are saying that the D5200 blows away the Canon T4i right?

trixie

i’m really disappointed in nikon making the d5200 without flash fill. i feel i really need the articulating screen but also need flash fill. do you have any suggestions?

trixie

thanks for your feedback.
would you have any info regarding which camera is more reliable, durable and problem free? the d5200 or t5i?

PeterS

Thanks for this great article. I have spent several hours at various photo shops in my home town (Edmonton, Canada) comparing these two, using an existing Nikon lens. Interesting, the feedback I repeatedly got was that I should go with the 7100 as it was a “better” camera (there were lots of reasons why, but that was the bottom line). However, having small hands and not liking the weight, my gut told me that the 5200 was the better camera for me, and with photos I took at the store, there was very little difference I could see between pictures I took with these two cameras, except when I zoomed in and then dramatically cropped the photos and expanded them (I took along my own card to let me compare photos at home, and I have to say the store staff were excellent at allowing me to play around and give advice – shout out to McBain Camera). Thus, for most of the photographers who will use these cameras I will agree that we will never notice differences in image quality between them. Thus, I am off to get the 5200 and am really grateful you gave such clear advice

Ryan

I just spent a couple of hours reading through the articles and links on this site and all I can say is thank you!! for all of the helpful details and explanations. I’ve never used a DSLR camera before but always been obsessive about taking photos in my compact digital camera…now I’m receiving a DSLR camera of my choice as a graduation present and have been almost overwhelmed by the possibilities as a beginner. If I normally would just be taking photos of scenery/architecture/social activities, as a beginner would the D5200 be too overwhelming as my first DSLR? And what would be the best lens that I would want to buy for these purposes? I’ve read some of your lenses links but I’d like just a quality lens for a great value, nothing super expensive that professionals use. I wouldn’t be worried about having a great macro lens as I can’t imagine I’d be taking very many extreme close-up shots. Money is not an option but from what I’d be using it for the D7100 seems excessive vs the D5200. Thanks!

Edwin

Hi Mathew.
i just got my nikon d5200 and plans to buy a nikkor 70-300 manual lens do you think its a got idea? Thanks

Juliet

Hi Matthew,

I’m an amateur photographer where I do it mainly as a hobby. I’ve been using a Nikon D3000 for two years and finally decided I wanted to upgrade to a nicer camera. I do have a budget but I can’t decide between the D5200 and D7100 when it comes to what I’ll be using them for. I’ll be doing a lot of portrait photoshoots mostly and I go to conventions where I take hall photos of people in costumes or do private shoots. I also want to occasionally take some video but nothing too extreme like a cinematic endeavor. A lot of conventions have bad lighting unless we’re outside (and the sun conveniently is out). I currently have a Nikon 50mm f/1.8D and if I get the D5200 I would have to get a new 50mm for I am done with not having autofocus. But if I get the D7100 I get to keep the lens I currently have, and save money on future lens that don’t have AF-S. Overall, buying one or the other is about the same (with the D7100 being $200 more) and I just can’t decide on what to pick for the final plunge.

Any suggestions? (And if you possibly have a lens recommendation for conventions that would be great too)

Thanks!

Erik Maes

Hi Matthew,

First of all congratulations with your excellent review. It is by far the most useful review on the D5200 I’ve read so far. It contains technical details but what’s most important to me is that it’s down to earth. Why bother about differences between 2 cameras that you will only notice in lab conditions…

I myself finally bought the D5200 with a Nikkor 18-200mm lens. The other choice would have been the D7000 (when I bought my camera last Jan the D7100 was not yet out). But after long deliberation I made for myself the conclusion that I would probably never use the extra features that the D7000 offers over the D5100 and that a lower weight and more recent components were more important.

But after having shot some 2000 or 3000 pictures I have mixed feelings about the camera. In many cases my D5200 produces incredibly sharp images, both indoors as outdoors. But at the same time, I often have pictures that are (slightly) out of focus, or definitely do not have the sharpness I expects from a DSLR, although I’m absolutely sure that the focussing point is exactly on my subject.

Did you ever come across focussing issues when testing the D5200? I’m not sure if it’s camera-related (that is having a bad body) or user-related (me doing something wrong). But anyhow this is how I typically focus: set focussing to single-point AF (center), point at the subject and half-press the shutter button and finally do the composition.

In fact I should take it back to my camera-dealer but I’d be also very much interested in any tips/views you might have.

Kind regards
Erik

Mick

G’day Matthew

Very inexperienced with DSLR (although I have an older Olympus) but after reading your great review I have decided to buy a D5200 both for photos and occasional movie function.
At this stage I am looking for an all round lens and would appreciate your advice regarding which of the standard lens packages (18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR NIKKOR or 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR ED NIKKOR) would be the better choice.
Have also considered buying a Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S separately.

Thanks for your help
Mick

Mick

G’day Matthew

Great info from you and other comments. Have settled on the D5200 and went to the store to buy. I was also shown a Tamron 18-270 VC PZD lens which I thought was terrific as a single lens to “do all” when walking around on holidays. Great zoom!

Is it a reasonable option for me?

Appreciate your knowledge.

Cheers
Mick

Mick

Thanks Matthew for all your help.

Cheers
Mick

Steve Solomon

Mick, Along with Matthew’s fine comments, as a current D5200 user, I can attest to the very high quality (sharpness, detail rendition, color) of these 2 Nikkors: the 16-85 f/3.5-5.6, and the 35mm f/1.8. I think the 16-85 is probably the sharpest of the zooms mentioned thus far, although obviously not nearly as sharp as the wonderful 35mm f/1.8. For sample images taken with the D5200 and these fine optics, please check out my stock photography site. Thank you! Steve

Elisabeth

Yes, I second that about the 16-85mm 3.5-5.6. I just got it as a replacement to a defective refurbished 18-105mm. The problem with the 18-105 was with the auto focus motor. I could still manually focus it, so I did many studio still life shots with it. The 16-85 is much better quality. The build is a bit better and seems to be better corrected.

diuc

Let me also chime in with a lens recommendation: the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM. It’s a GREAT lens for the price, and well worth the price difference to the kit lenses.

I have the Sigma, plus a 35mm f1.8 (which I very rarely use anymore) and a Tamron AF 60mm f/2.0 for portraits.

Steve Solomon

diuc,
Yes, the Sigma 17-50 “sounds” like a fine choice, except that in my case, I wanted that slightly wider view afforded by the 16-85 Nikkor, albeit with the slower maximum aperture. Plus, I just like the 100% compatibility and build quality of these Nikkors, although I admit to never having used this particular Sigma lens. That said, for an ultra-wide option however, I have been considering the Sigma 8-16 for Nikon, as no one else makes one, and I’ve read some good reviews on it. Thanks, Steve

Ann

Hi Matthew,

I am a camera dummy but a photo snob (raised by a parent who was a professional photographer). I’m about to enter the world of DSLR ownership and learning because I’m always disappointed by compact digital camera results – yep, a big “DUH” from all of you who know what you’re talking about when you discuss cameras.

I’ve been considering the D5200 with an additional flash for beginning my journey of truly learning about DSLR cameras/photography. However, after reading all of the helpful comments/answers above, I’m concerned the D5200 may prove disappointing when it comes to the flash.

I want a camera with a VERY fast auto-focus and a manual focus. Also, I want to use an external flash (I’m never satisfied with the results of pop-up flashes). While the ability to take macro photos is not very important, I’d like to take crisp/clear portrait-type photos of people where the face fills the frame (or even just zoom in on the eyes). I also want to be able to quickly take crisp/clear photos using a telephoto lens whether it be indoor sports or outdoor at the lake.

Is the D5200 the camera for me (a total novice who wants to learn) and will the flash abilities of the D5200 allow me to quickly take a beautifully crisp/clear picture while using a speedlight?

Thank you

David from Miami

Hello Matthew:

I currently have a Nikon D40 (it was the best I could do at the time) and realize that I need to “get with the program” if I want to improve the quality of my photographic images. I consider myself to be an intermediate-level amateur photographer.

I am looking to purchase a new camera and was pondering the D7000. I enjoy close-up work so sharp images are critical for me. I don’t need all the bells and whistles of the D7100 (I don’t care about video capability, for example) but want more than the D5200. The D7000 seems like a perfect fit – do you agree? I plan to also purchase a Nikkor 105mm macro. You mentioned the Sigma 180mm f/2.8 macro. Is that comparable in quality to Nikon macro lenses?

Is the difference in resolution between the two cameras (24 vs 16 mp) important to someone who doesn’t plan on printing posters? Just how important is higher resolution? Who would require that in a camera? Is more necessarily better?

Lastly, I have heard people tell me that Canon cameras are as good if not better than Nikon. Can you suggest a Canon mid-range camera comparable to the D7000 or D7100?

Many thanks for your great advice and thoughtful answers to all of our questions. David

David from Miami

Matthew:

Many thanks for the detailed, thoughtful reply to my message – you addressed all of my questions! I would not get that kind of attention from a camera salesman in a store.

When using the “Which to buy?” guidelines at the end of your article, I answer “yes” to most of the features found in the D7100 compared to the D5200. The price difference is significant, but I do not want to compromise on image sharpness (I take close-ups) and like the micro-adjustment focusing capability of the D7100. At the same time, I am willing to bet that I would not be able to see any differences between these cameras.

Bottomline: Your assistance has convinced me (1) not to consider a Canon mid-range camera at this time, (2) not to rule out the D5200 over the D7100/D7000 and (3) to consider a Sigma macro lens. Next step: Get these cameras in my hands and see how they feel and operate.

Many thanks, Matthew. You are like having a personal camera consultant – its awesome!

Best regards, David

Elisabeth

Thanks for this very clear review!

I decided to purchase the D5200 simply because of its size (I have very small hands and my Canon 5D Mark II has been really hard on my hands). I need a zoom for walk around shooting and something for portraits. My initial pick (based on price and reviews) was the 18-105mm 3.5/5.6, 85mm 1.8G, & 50mm 1.8G. I tested the 18-105 but suspect I got a bad one (it was a refurb.) as all shots are out of focus. I’m wondering now if I should get something else. I’ve been scouring the internet trying to figure out what the sharpest lenses are to go with the 5200. Do you have any advice?

Thanks!

Elisabeth

Thanks for that great link Matthew, very helpful!

After spending hours reviewing lens tests & looking at sample photos I ended up purchased the 16-85mm 3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR. According to photozone it tests better than the 16-35, particularly at the 35mm end. It offers a greater range and VR II. The 16-85 is reported to be sharper and is half the price of the 16-35. DXO gives the two lenses very similar ratings on DX sensors but the problem I have with DXO’s ratings is that they don’t break down these numbers for the different focul lengths and apertures like photozone. For this reason and the fact that I keep reading photographers who’s actual shooting experience with a lens differs from the DXO ratings I end up questioning the value of their reports.

Anyway, this gives me a good walk around range. I’ve been using the Canon 24-105 (on full frame), so it’s comparable. Then I’ll have the two nice primes. The list you posted will be helpful in determining my future ‘wish list’.

Steve Solomon

Good choice, Elizabeth! I use the NIkkor 16-85 on my D5200 with good results. For sample images, please check out my website. The Aruba images were shot mostly with the 16-35 (with a B+W UV mrc filter to protect the front element), and still requiring only minor tweaking in post.
Have fun! Steve

S-

I want to buy a camera that will work for me for while. I finally buying a dslr. I really like the idea of water proofing. I would like a durable camera. Not that abuse my prior cameras but it appears DLSR requires more matinance than toerhe types of cameras. I have no lenses
I’m thinking to get either canon 60d with I think 18-200mm Letnse
or possibly a Nikon d7100 with the same type of lense
As you know canon 60d is less expensive.
Is weather sealing create better sealed camera?
If nikon d5200 was weather sealed i was going to buy the bundle with 2 lenses. I forgot the specifications.
The more I read the more confused I get….
I am really interested in photography. I finally am able to spend the money on a nice camera to pursue. I am not sure which features are really worth the money.
I just want a camera that take good pictures and I can use long time
It not high mataince

Miguel

Hi Matt,

The Nikon D5200 can´t use a external flash for High Speed sync? Example like yougnuo yn-568EX?

Sergey

Hello, Mattew!
Very informative article.
I’m new to the DSLR World. :-)
A couple of months ago I’ve bought a Nikon D5200 with AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR. My choice was actually between D5200 and D7100. I’ve made my decision for D5200 only ’cause at that moment I couldn’t wait any longer until the start of sales of D7100. And now, when D7100 is available for purchase I start to realize that I’m a bit disappointed with my choice (weather proof, better flash, built-in focus). The main issue is that I’m planning to get some new lenses, but they don’t have the VR.
What do you think how crucial is this point for taking high quality shots (without a tripod) with the camera that doesn’t have a built-in focus (D5200)?
Or probably I just mixed up the functions of VR and autofocus. Does the built-in focus help to avoid tiny shakes of camera during shooting? Or it’s only intended for better focusing?
The lenses of my choice are below. Please also recommend which of these would give me a better picture quality.
• AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G
• AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G
• AF-S DX Micro Nikkor 40mm f/2.8G ED
• Tokina AF 100mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro D macro
• Tamron AF 90mm f/2.8 SP Di macro
I’m aware of the AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G Micro VR IF-ED, but it’s a bit expensive for me now.

Thanks in advance,
Sergey

Sergey

Thanks for your reply, Matthew.

Now I started to read your other articles here on this site. Very informative and easy for comprehending.

Again, talking about the lenses that could match my needs* best with the D5200, let me ask you, what would you get within the following choice:

1) AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G (I read reviews that it’s one of the best portrait lense for it’s price)
2) AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G
3) Tokina AF 100mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro D macro
4) Tamron AF 90mm f/2.8 SP Di macro

I’m not sure if these macro lenses work correctly and smoothly with the D5200 without a built-in auto-focus.

* – My needs are: image quality, sharpness, nice bokeh.

As I said before, I have a kit lens AF-S Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR.
The reason I put on the list these two different purpose lenses (standard and macro) is that I’d like to have both advantages of each line. But at the moment I plan to buy only one of the list. Do you think I can get a nice portrait & landscape pictures with the macro lenses? Or maybe I should be more clear to myself first? :-)

Thanks in advance for your reply.
Sergey

Kshitij

Hi, Matt,

I am Kshitij and bought Nikon D5200 (with 18-105 KIT) about a month back (Its my first DSLR). Still trying to learn about it. I am very interested in shooting macro / birds and water. Can you please advise what lens should I get to shot macro which give me excellent picture quality.

Thanks for you help in advance.

Thanks,
Kshitij

Kshitij

Thanks for the help Matt. I really appreciate it.

Thanks,
Kshitij

shahnaz kazmi

i would like to buy D5200 , i think this is best ,,

Steve Solomon

Hi Matt.
I am using a new Nikon D5200, and am contemplating the D7100 for several reasons, but mainly the lack of the AA filter, with potential for sharper images from the same sensor. The question is how MUCH sharper?? Is this difference (plus the external flash synch, Commander mode, weather-sealing, button functionality, etc.), worth the extra $500? Thanks! Steve

Skibadee

Hello,

I’m a student who’s owned a D90 for a few years. I bought it as I started out in photography and it’s now been 3 years. I’m looking to upgrade but am unsure as to which camera to get, the D7100 or the D5200. from what I can tell here there doesn;t seem to be a whole lot of difference other than the build quality of the D7100 and the extra dial but at twice the cost.

Would you suggest going for the D5200 in the long run and saving my money for a new lens?

Cheers.

Skibadee

I don’t currently own any older D lenses, all of my lenses have AF-S and I doubt I’ll ever go back to getting an older one again without.

However I do use flash. I thought that the D90 had a top high speed sync of 1/200 the same as the D5200. As for the external flash controls I don’t quite understand what you mean, could you expand upon that? If you are speaking of the Auto FP does this mean that I can’t force higher shutter speeds with my flash…? I own an old SB-28 and would probably use it with the DSLR.

Thanks again!

John Willwerth

Hi Matthew,

Great comparison of the D5200 and D7100. I have been using a D50 for several years now and finally plan to upgrade. I am definitely an amateur photographer, but try to learn some things as I go. I mainly shoot outdoors, whether catching my pets in action, photographing scenic areas, or taking automotive pictures. I also like to get closeup shots of my pets and other animals. I will probably use video a lot as well, whether it is with my pets, kid, or car. I currently have the AF NIKKOR 28-80mm f3.3-f5.6 G and AF NIKKOR 70-300mm f4-f5.6 G lenses. Are either of these lenses compatible with the two cameras? Which camera do you think would be best suited for me and should I try different lenses? Also, which photo editing software would you recommend? Thanks!

John

Terry

HI Matthew,

I’m considering upgrading from a Nikon D3100 to either the D5200 or D7100. I’m an amateur, not close to a professional. I use the camera a lot for family and travel photography. I take a lot pictures at my son’s hockey games where the lighting conditions are poor and the action is fast. So I need a camera that will do a good job in those conditions. Is there a difference between the D5200 vs. D7100 in those low light fast action conditions?
Also my wife will be using the camera and she doesn’t use any manual settings. She would use strictly auto/preset settings. Would either camera be easier for her to use?

Which camera would you recommend?

Thanks

Derek

Hi, I am currently shopping for a new camera, looking to move up from my d3100, and am having a tough time deciding between the d5200 and the d7100. While I am not new to the dslr world, I would not consider myself to be an advanced photographer in any way, so a lot of the cool features of the d7100 might be lost on me. With that being said, I do plan on using this next camera for landscape shooting, which will require me to carry it to many different places while hiking in rough terrain and potentially cruddy weather. In that case would it be worth getting the camera with weather sealing vs. one without? Any advice you could offer would be appreciated.

Rik

Hi Matthew,

Good article, it pretty much supports other reviews I’ve read.

I’ve been considering the d7100 and recently read a review about the d7000 written by Thom Hogan in which he said

“… don’t buy the D7000 for it’s resolution and then wimp out on lenses. You’ll achieve nothing that you couldn’t get on the 12mp cameras. If you’re going to invest in more pixels, you need to invest in good lenses”

I couldn’t agree more however it leaves me in a bit of a dilemma when I think of the d7100. My question is in regards to my current selection of lenses, and whether they are “good enough” to take advantage of the new high-resolution 24.1 MP sensor in the d7100?

Currently I have the following lenses and they have worked pretty well on my d90. I’m fairly certain that the primes I have will be fine, but I’m looking for some input about the zooms.

Sigma AF 17-70 2.8-4.5 Macro HSM

NIkkor 18-200 3.5-5.6

Nikkor AF-S 35mm 1.8 G

Nikkor 50mm 1.8 d

Thanks for your input.

rik

Steven

Hi Mathew,
I currently have a D5000. Mainly shoot children & family portraits, some wildlife & landscapes. I have been looking at upgrading to the D5100, D5200, or maybe the D7000. Budget is a big factor. After reading your post and Q&A I’m leaning towards the D5200. Do you think I will see enough of an improvement in the D5200 or should I jump to the 7000 to see enough improvements to justify the purchase.

Thanks.

-Steven

Charlotte

Hello Matthew,

I am looking to buy a Nikon and was all set on the 5200 until I read this.

My main use will be photographing my paintings. They are medium sized (biggest for now is around 100cm x 100cm) with some texture from collage and built-up paint surface. I would like to capture the texture without it casting a lot of shadows. And there are some problems with glare and reflections when I use oil paints or other higher-gloss media.

Some research says I will do better with a macro lens. The one I am considering at the moment is the Tamron AF 90 mm F/2.8. I guess I will also need to get a tripod and a polarizing filter.

With my current camera, a disaster, I get the best results at night, with two very amateurish lights at either side. I don’t know if a better camera will make daylight more workable.

I am very much an amateur photographer, but want to make the highest quality photos possible, so that I can also sell prints of my paintings. I would love to learn to do this without having to depend on a professional.

Given the above, would you recommend that I start with a 5200 or a 7100? The latter gets a bit pricey with the macro lens, but if it will make a huge difference in quality so that I end up being able to sell prints, I will consider it.

Thanks,

Charlotte

Steve Solomon

Nice comparison sir! I jumped into the Nikon world with a D5200, a Nikkor 16-85 and a Nikkor 35. My main concern is image sharpness, coming from a Pentax K-5 and some wickedly sharp Pentax optics. I only found out post-purchase that the D5200 has no AF Adjustment or even any sharpness adjustment, which is a bit worrisome. In any case, I will be testing this Nikon kit very soon, to see if I get equal or (hopefully) even better sharpness and detail from my images, given the higher resolution sensor. If not, I may consider the D7100 instead. Thanks again, Steve

Sri

I want the professional picture quality when I shoot elements indoors or even outdoors … Which one do you consider for me Matthew ?

Reuben

Hi Matthew,

I am doing all my wife’s camera work for her business as a realtor so alot of interior shots with wide angle lens to post on Multiple Listing Service. I would use for nature photography as well. Narrowed it down to Nikon D5200 or the new D7100. Would pass on lens kit and buy Nikon 35mm f/1.8 for every day use and Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 for wide angle, Would add SB-400 flash to bounce some light off ceiling etc when doing interior shots. Kind of leaning towards the D7100 for the extra $400 over the D5200 as it is more durable and better use in elements outside. Would add tripod. What do you think?

farbod

hi..
d7000 or d5200?????
please help

Emily T

Hey Matt!
Thanks for your article about D5200 and D7100. I currently have a D3100 + 18-105mm lens which I used intensively during a 7-month trip last year… I’m planning to ‘upgrade’ to a better DSLR because my D3100 is kinda worn out + have the impression of having reached its limits anyway + I’m planning a safari trip in Tanzania end of the year. I mainly take pictures when I travel, so weight is a concern… but I’m ready to reconsider that if a heavier body makes the difference!!
First I have to invest in a better lens for the safari; probably Nikon AFS 55-300mm or Tamron 18-270mm because I cannot afford more, as I also want to buy a new body… which would have to be more powerful and durable! I was considering the D7100 because of its higher features (AF points, 1.3 crop mode, body material, shooting speed, 2SD slots…) but the price is a real pain point… Would D7000 be an option to consider too? Which body would you recommend between the 3 options?
Also, do you have any advice on lenses?
Thanks
Emily

Emily T

Hi Matt,

Thanks for your advice! Wow, isn’t there any options between the Nikkor EF-S 80-400 ED VR and the Tamron 70-300 VC in terms of price range?! I’ve tested the Nikkor 80-400 in the Galapagos last year; the Ecuadorian guide actually bought it for his job and lend it to me for about an hour, and honestly, that was awesome!! But… I can’t definitively afford that one, I’m just an amateur after all, so the Tamron sounds like a good option!

In terms of body, as I’m a heavy traveler, I’m afraid that the D5200 is too fragile with its plastic structure. My D3100 had some “heart attacks” under the rain last year; basically it could still take pictures but the screen and buttons in the back would not respond during a whole day! It was like taking pictures with a traditional camera again. That was a good training but I would definitively prefer not face this stressing situation again. So if the D7100 can better handle outdoor activities, I’ll definitively pay the extra $400!

Technoholic

Hi Matt,
According to this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEejCOqccC0
there are some issues with the aperture settings in live view and video mode for D7100. And it is a hardware thing so it cant be fixed by a firmware update.Do you think that would be much a problem? Do D5200 and all other entry level Nikon DSLR cameras have this issue?

Thanks

Technoholic

Thanks Matt. :)

Luis Ramos

Thanks, Matt;
So, there would not be any advantage for the D7100 on the use of manual lenses, then…
I liked the articulated lcd screen of the D5200… but there are risks of breaking it, isn’t?
Luis

Luis Ramos

Hi, Matt;
Very good comments! I have some old manual lenses that I would like to use with one of these two DSLRs. Decause D7100 has a motor built in, would it be an advantage for me?
Also I wonder if one can have infrared captured with any of those cameras… That would be nice for me, too…
Do they filter for visible spectrum only?
Thanks!
Luis

Sao Choi

Hi Matthew! I want to buy the camare for photography and video. 700D and D5200 which one should to buy ? Thank for your recommence.

ARG

Hi Matt,
I am a newbie to DSLR cameras.I found your post and all the comments here really helpful.But still, I am having hard time deciding over Canon T5i vs Nikon D5200 for my first camera in that price range. I am getting slightly inclined towards Canon only because,as is evident from the pictures you see in all photography magazines and flickr, there are more number of EOS 5D Mark3 and EOS 70D users. so I think I will be able to borrow some good Canon lenses from friends who have 5D Mark3. Could you please suggest if I should prefer T5i over D5200 for this reason in spite of D5200 having better features?

Thanks again.

ARG

Thanks a lot Matt for the quick Reply. Just want to make sure,can I use all the high end Canon lenses used with 5DMark3 and EOS 7D also with Rebel T5i? I assume ‘yes’ because that’s the only reason I would prefer T5i

ARG

Thank you very much Matt.I really appreciate that.

shiv

Hi Matthew,

I am looking for a camera that does both photos and video. I also like to postprocess photos to some extent.
can you provide your thoughts on D5200 in comparision to NEX-6. On paper the nex-6 features looks more than D5200 but I do not want to go for the extra feature compromising the quality. I normally find Nikon D5100/D5200 picture rich and bright in daylight compared NEX. Is this due to lens or is it something we can get by tweaking whitebalance. I am fine with the size of a DSLR. How is D5200 videos in comparision with Nex-6. If NEX-6 is tad better due to the manual controls in video, would it be compromising on the photo quality .

Thanks
Shiv

Jarot

Reviewer forgot an important difference between the D5200 and D7100; manual white balance setting. D5200 only has auto settings and a photo reference mode.

sijya

how is choosing a reference card different from white balance settings in a d3200? does d5200 have advantages?

Wayne

hi thanks for the review Matthew. I have a d3100, recently bought an Olympus OM-D, which I thought would be great, but found the picture quality to be inferior, so going away mid year and want to take best pics I can, so looking at the d5200. I would assume the d5200 is a more advanced camera, not just the mp count. I find both cameras poor at video, but love my Sony cx350. When shutter life dies, is it repairable or through camera away

wayne

thanks for the input, i’m getting a d5200 with wifi adapter, from ryda, and will have 2 year au warranty as its not a grey import

kevin

Thank you Matt. I am still trying to figure out if the D5200 or Canon T4i is better for me. I want it to take lots of sporting event pictures. Like volleyball and basketball games. I am new to DSLR cameras so I am needing help. Also, could you recommend a telephoto lens for me. I appreciate any assistance.

Sergey

Great review!
All is clear and simple. Thanks. By the way, I bought the D5200 before the D7100 release date. But still keep reading different reviews to understand if I made the right choice. I hope I was right, time will show.

JJ Hsu

Thanks for the review. I will go with the D7100, I will wait for the price to go down.

Saood

Hi,
Mr. Gore, I really appreciate your article; however, while searching on the net for the this camera, a site said that this camera has an issue, bad sharpness. It appears that even with a prime lens, not set on max aperture, the camera barely reaches the level of sharpness of a Sony NEX-5N with a kit lens. Will that affect the quality much? Keep in mind that I might buy some decent glass in the future.
Thank you

Richard

Thanks a lot for to informative article. I’m upgrading from D90 and am having this exact dilemma. I really want to get into video work, would you say the D7100 is worth the extra money for this? I know it has a higher res screen which would be useful for fine tuning the focus, but then again the tilting LCD on the D5200 could come in useful. it appears hey bkth shoot same resolution. Also, I’m worried I may miss the Led screen on the top of the camera (as on the D90). Do you think this is the kind of thing I’d just get used to? Thanks!

Gouthams

Hi matthew,

I am new to this site from India, all day long I have been reading your replies to the members who had commented on your posts and be to frank I am really impressed with your knowledge and patient endurance. And the details that you divulged were really useful for an amateur photographer like me. I have never signed up for any website or anything but I have signed up for this site. Just for you and your way of helping those who really find it hard to decide. Nice work, keep up.. best wishes

Bhavin

Hi Matt,

Can you compare d600 with d7100.I know that d600 is an AF disaster from nikon (all af points are in center) and now i am assuming that since d7100 has 51 af poins, output will me more sharper than d600 is that true?

Bradley

Do you have any sample images to compare the 2? Also have you noticed any of the moire effects in d7100 after playing around with it for a bit?

nate

great review. thanks a lot. in terms of photo quality (in most regular situation – family, trips) do you notice a real difference between d7100 to d5200? or a difference that worth the extra $?

nate

I read your opinion that Nikon at this level is better than T4i. same goes with the T5i? I will use the dslr mostly for still picture. what’s your take?

another last question…what lenses do you recommend to buy with d5200 (portrait and general use)? thanks…

nate

thank you. I’ll go with d5200.

Ali

thank you, review vas wonderful I go with D5200

Dawn

Thank you. This review was very helpful to compare these. I will be buying a Nikon SLR in the near future and was looking at both of these. Now I have a better idea on how they compare.