Canon 5D Mark III - Light and Matter

The Waiting is Over: Canon 5D Mark III Announced

Following years of anticipation, the Canon EOS 5D Mark III was officially unveiled  today, coinciding with the 25th Anniversary of the launch of the EOS Camera System. Surprisingly, Canon has positioned the Mark III as an additional member of the line rather than as a replacement for the Mark II.

When the 5D Mark II was announced nearly four years ago, it seemed to be an almost perfect camera: high resolution, great image quality,  excellent low-light capabilities, the best DSLR-video to date, and it was relatively inexpensive compared to the 1Ds Mark III which housed the same sensor. It did have a few of drawbacks, though… mostly speed related. It only shot about 3 frames per second, it’s maximum flash sync speed was oddly 1/200th sec rather than 1/250th, and its autofocus system was essentially the same as that found in the entry-level Rebel line, with only one cross-type sensor and 9 overall. Additionally, some users reported problems with the weather sealing (notably, in Antarctica).

Canon 5d Mark III with Battery Grip
Matthew Gore | Light And Matter

The 5D Mark III has not only addressed the problems, but built on the strengths of its predecessor. The Mark III carries the same top-notch auto-focus system as the 1D X, with 61 AF point, 41 of them cross-type. With the new Digic 5+ processor, the 5D Mark III has doubled the frame-rate of the Mark II, now shooting up to 6 fps, even in RAW format. Canon also improved the weather sealing and gaskets, placing it just below (but not on par with) the 1D X in terms of reliability in adverse conditions.

Oddly enough, while Canon does claim improved reliability in the shutter module and a life-span of 150,000 shots, Canon did not see fit to improve the sync speed: the Mark III still syncs at a maximum of 1/200th sec. before high-speed sync (with its dramatic power loss) is required.

Improving on the Mark II, the Mark III utilizes a new 22.3 Megapixel sensor with improved resolution and low-light performance, with a native top ISO range of 25600, expandable to 102,400 (H2). The camera’s dual card slots hold an SD and a Compact Flash, as has become popular, and video functionality has been improved to match the Canon 1D X, with a choice of h264 recording formats and automatic splitting of files at 4G to sidestep video length limits.

Along with the 5D Mark III, Canon announced a new flagship Speedlite, the 600EX-RT, with incorporated radio-triggering to replace the problematic IR system currently in use. A hot-shoe mounted radio control-module, the ST-E3-RT, was also released, ablet o control up to 15 flash units in 5 groups. The range of operation is not up to PocketWizard standards, but at 100 feet (30 meters), it’s still a dramatic improvement over the pre-flash system currently in use, and it doesn’t require line-of-sight with the flashes.

The 5D Mark III is expected to be on store shelves by the end of the month (March 2012) at a cost of $3500. The Speedlite 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT transmitter are also expected this month, at $630 and $470. New wireless file-transmitter, and GPS unit, and battery grips will be available later in the Spring.

Canon 5D Mark III with 600EX-RT Flash and Transmitter
Matthew Gore | Light And Matter

Editor-in-Chief
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nathan

HI, I am planing from upgrading my camera to the new 5D mk III and I have a question. I didn’t understand for sure and thats why I ask you. For me it would be very important to be able to High Speed Sync and that’s why I thought buying instead of two 600 EX and a ST E3, a Pocket Wizard set for my 580 EX IIs.
Here is my question: If I buy two 600 EX and a RT E3 transmitter will I be able HSS? For example will my flash sync at 1/4000 or 1/8000 only with a 600EX and a ST E3?
Thank you:)!

Nathan

Thank you the fast reply Matthew!
I want to get this system because its not 3rd party and it very easy to use.
So if I have 2 600EXes and one is mounted on the 5D mk III and one in a tripod I have HSS or I still have to buy a ST E3 transmitter? Or is in the 5D mk III a radio trigger that triggers flashes? (I know this is unlikely because it would be no use for the transmitter, but it would be sick!)

Have a nice day!

Alan Zimmerman

I currently shoot a 5D with the canon 24-105 and am wanting to upgrade to either the canon Mll or Mlll. I”m debating whether the more than$1000 difference is worth it. I’m mainly doing landscapes and available light. Flash synch is not an issue, nor video capability. The main question is, will the Mlll have substantially better color noise control at ISOs of 1200-2600?
Any ideas based on pre release info.?
Thanks for any suggestions.
Alan Zimmerman

Alan Zimmerman

When you write your review of the Canon 5D Mlll, it will be good to include examples which allow one to see discern-able differences in the DIGI 5 chip as well as discern=able differences in the ISOs above 1600. If these comparisons are the Mll vs Mlll it will help to decide if the new one is indeed worth $1300 ore.
Looking forward to your review.
Alan Zimmerman

Ed Wheaton

I have a dumb question. I guess I am doing something wrong. I was looking at all those autofocus points on this camera and I must be missing something. I have a Canon Rebel and when I focus it, I use one spot in the middle. I focus it, then while holding down the shooting button I move the viewfinder to where I want it. Anytime I try to use all the autofocus points (where you don’t have one point in the middle, but instead have a “bracket”) I end up with poorly focused shots. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong? When should I use the “bracket” and all the points and when should I not? Thanks.

Ed Wheaton

Thank you for the reply. So another dumb question. If a lot of people only choose a single point in the center to focus with them recompose, what is the advantage of spending the extra money on a 61 point autofocus? That makes the 5d mark 2 more appealing to me since the autofocus changes seem to be the biggest thing they did. What would be examples of scenarios when you would leave the autofocus to pick for itself with all 61 points instead of just choosing a center focus point and using it? I guess I just don’t understand what all the fuss is about 61 points vs 31 vs 9 if most people only use one anyway. Sorry for being so confused and asking dumb questions. I just don’t understand what makes this better than a 9 point system and I don’t get all the cross types vs others and all that.

Ed Wheaton

Thank you Matthew for the clarification. I get it now. I do have a 1.4 lens. I will remember what you said about no recomposing with that. Would you not recompose at 2.8 either? As a rule do YOU shift the focus point rather then recompose when the spot falls where you need it? I don’t have a tripod. I read an article by this guy named Rockwell that is supposed to be a great photographer and he claimed digital cameras don’t need them, so I followed his advice. I’ve been away from photography for a long time. My last real camera was a Pentax from the mid 90’s. I have grandkids now and am getting back into it.

Ed Wheaton

Thank you for that advice, When I read that he was moving his family out to sea to live on a boat so he could avoid paying CA taxes, I should have put two and two together.
I’ll practice not recomposing, thanks again.

labradorguy

LMAO!!

Mike Pruner

Looks like a great piece of equipment. I will be very interested to see what they come out with in the 7D MKII or 8D area. Any idea on when we might see something there?

Mike Pruner

I hope so, the 5D Mk III is way out of my range. Although I am pretty happy with my T3i, I would like something faster, with better noise handling and more FPS ability for action/sports.

Not sure I need a FF camera at this point.

Thanks for the info!
M