A password will be e-mailed to you.

The Nikon D5200 outclasses any Canon camera in its price range, at least for the time being. It is faster, with a better AF system and image sensor than any of the “Rebel” series cameras, and in many ways surpasses even the (admittedly out-dated) Canon 60D, making it the obvious choice for most photography enthusiasts. Unfortunately, the choice is not so easy when the new Nikon D7100 enters the discussion. Which one is right for you? Below, I’ll compare the most significant differences.

Nikon D5200 vs D7100: What’s the Difference?

To begin with, we can take a look at the most significant specs for the D5200 and the D7100. I’ve also included those of the Nikon D7000, a camera that has been exceedingly popular with amateur and professional photographers alike for the past few years.

    
ModelNikon D5200Nikon D7100Nikon D7000
Price (body)
$696[aprice asin='B00BI9X7UC']$896
Price (with 18-105 kit lens)
3/15/2013
$1096$1496$1096
Body MaterialPlasticPartial Magnesium Alloy Frame, PlasticPartial Magnesium Alloy Frame, Plastic
Sensor Resolution24.1 Megapixels
(Toshiba)
24.1 Megapixels
(Toshiba)
16 Megapixels
(Sony)
Anti-Aliasing Filter
(Reduces sharpness, prevents moire)
YESNOYES
ISO Range100-6400
+12800
+25600
100-6400
+12800
+25600
100-6400
+12800
+25600
Total AF Points395139
Cross-Type AF Points9159
AF Motor In Body
(For Using Older AF Lenses)
NOYESYES
AF Light Level Range-1 to +19 EV-2 to +19 EV-1 to +19 EV
Autofocus Fine Tuning
Adjustments
NOYESYES
Shutter Speed Range1/4000th - 30 sec.
+bulb
1/8000th - 30 sec.
+bulb
1/8000th - 30 sec.
+bulb
Expected Shutter Life100,000 Shots150,000 Shots150,000 Shots
Max Frame Rate5 fps6 fps
(7 shots in 1.3x crop mode)
6 fps
Max RAW Burst
(buffer size)
8 shots, compressed 14-bit7 shots lossless 12-bit
6 shots lossless 14-bit
11 shots lossless 12-bit
10 shots lossless 14-bit
Max JPG Burst
(fine, Large)
353331
Flash Sync Speed1/200th sec.1/250th sec.
(1/320th* sec, or slower,)
1/250th sec.
Wireless Flash
(Built-in Commander)
NOYESYES
Auto FP Flash Mode
(High Speed Sync)
NOYESYES
Media Slots1 SD / SDHC / SDXC2 SD / SDHC / SDXC2 SD / SDHC / SDXC
LCD Size3.0"
921,000 pixels
3.2"
1,228,800 pixels
3.0"
921,000 pixels
LCD ArticulatedYesNoNo
Body Weight505g (no battery)
555 g (with battery)
675 (no battery)690g (no battery)
780g (with battery)
Battery Life500 shots
CIPA Standards
950 shots
CIPA Standards
1050 shots
CIPA Standards
Viewfinder Coverage95% Frame
.78x Magnification
100% Frame
.94x Magnification
100% Frame
.95x Magnification
Video CodecMPEG-4 / H.264
.mov
MPEG-4 / H.264
.mov
MPEG-4 / H.264
.mov
Video Resolutions1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30, 25, 24 fps)
1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps)
640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)
1920 x 1080 (60i*, 50i*, 30, 25, 24 fps)
1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps)
640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)

*only in 1.3x crop mode
1920 x 1080 (24fps)
1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24 fps)
PAL or NTSC
Video Length Limit29 min 59 sec.29 min 59 sec.About 20 Minutes
Headphone JackNoYesNo
Internal MicStereoStereoMono

.

Build Quality

Perhaps the most obvious difference between the D7100 and the D5200 is in their construction. The D5200 is smaller and lighter, with a body made entirely of polycarbonate, while the D7100 is heavier and built for durability, with a metal (magnesium alloy) back and top.  Since the D5200 also uses a smaller battery, the carry-around weight of the D7100 is about 30% more than the D5200.

Whether this is an advantage or disadvantage depends on your photographic needs; some photographers (especially those with larger hands) prefer a larger camera with some ‘heft’ to it, while others prefer something more lightweight and easy to carry around, especially travelers and hikers. Needless to say, those who work in harsh conditions will also prefer the D7100’s weather sealing and heavier-duty construction, as a matter of practicality.

The Sensor : Lack of AA Filter Probably Not Significant

The success of the D800e may have led directly to Nikon’s decision to produce an APS-C camera without an anti-aliasing (AA) filter, but whatever led to the fact, the D7100’s sensor is naked.  Before the D800e, all of the major SLRs produced their sensors with an AA filter: essentially an extra layer in front of the sensor that blurs the image slightly, in order to reduce the jagged edges and moire that have traditionally been associated with digital capture. With modern improvements in image processing software, though, Nikon was confident that the moire and jaggies could be avoided without the AA filter, so they opted to remove it and allow the cameras to capture finer image detail.

Comparisons of images produced by the D800 (AA Filter) and D800e (no AA Filter) have shown that the principle works; there are subtle improvements in fine detail in the D800e’s images. However, we should not expect such significant improvements in the D7100’s images. The receptors on the 24 megapixel sensor of the D7100 are already much, much smaller than those of the D800e. In fact, the D7100 fits about 56% more pixels into the same sensor area than the D800e1.

Why does that matter? Even with the much larger receptors of the D800, lens resolution has become a serious bottle-neck for image quality2. The dramatically higher pixel density of Nikon’s 24 megapixel sensors will tax lens resolution even more, meaning that the D7100’s images won’t get much sharper unless lenses get sharper first.

So, it is reasonable to expect that the center portion of images taken with the D7100 and your best lenses will show slight improvements in fine detail compared to the D5200, but don’t expect much more… and that is assuming that you’re using a tripod and other best-practices for maximizing sharpness.

Auto Focus Systems

Unlike most entry and mid-level SLRs, the Nikon D5200 has a very sophisticated autofocus system. While cameras like the Canon T4i and 60D have 9 autofocus points, the D5200 has 39, though only 9 of them are cross-type 3.  As you can see from the chart above, this autofocus system, which also incorporates color information, has been adopted from the Nikon D7000.

The D7100, however, shares the same AF system with the flagship Nikon D4 and the D800: 51 AF points, including 15 cross-type… the best system available in a Nikon body.

For all but the most dedicated action photographers, the system in the D5200 (and D7000) will be more than sufficient, even if you’re buying a camera primarily for shooting sports. If your paycheck, however, is going to depend on your focusing system, the extra several hundred dollars will be well spent on the D7100.

D7100 vs d5200 back

Speed

When it comes to speed, the differences between the D5200 and D7100 are more modest that you might expect. The D7100 does have a top shutter speed that is one full f-stop faster than the D5200’s (ie, 1/8000th vs 1/4000th). When it comes to shooting bursts of photos, though, the D7100 only provides an additional frame per second over the D5200’s 5 fps (unless you’re shooting in 1.3x crop mode, in which case it will give up an additional frame per second).

More importantly, though, the under-sized buffer in the D7100 does not allow longer bursts than the D5200; in fact, the D5200 comes out on top in this case. While the D5200 can shoot bursts of 8 RAW (or 35 JPG) shots, the D7100 can only shoot 7 RAW (33 JPG) before the buffer is full. Compare this to the 15 RAW shots allowed by a Canon 60D or 25 in a 7D4, and it will be clear that neither Nikon is probably ideal for photographers who rely on the machine-gun method of action photography.

Overhead, Nikon D7100 and D5200

The D5200’s Downfall

Flash. With the popularity of “Strobist” techniques over the past several years, flash photography has become increasingly important to amateur and semi-pro photographers, and this is where the D5200 falls short: it lacks high-speed-sync (Auto FP Flash, henceforth AFP) and external flash control with the built-in flash. External flash control may not be a big deal; many of us prefer to use radio-units instead… though the built-in IR system can be very useful with Nikon’s Creative Lighting System (CLS).

The lack of AFP, however, is a serious problem. Consider this situation: you’re shooting a portrait outdoors during the day, and you want to use a large aperture to blur the background… perhaps f/2 or f/1.4 . This will push your shutter speed beyond 1/1000ths of a second, much higher than the camera’s 1/200th sec. maximum sync speed. So, if you want to use a flash to soften the shadows or create a catch-light in the eyes of your subject, forget it: the flash will not sync. The same is true if you want to use flash for sports and a high shutter speed, and while you can purchase external command modules or radio transmitters for off-camera-flashes, there’s nothing you can buy to work around the lack of AFP. You’d need to buy the D7100 instead.

All the Little Things

There are a few other assorted differences that deserve mention here, but they’re mostly the same differences that we saw between the D5100 and D7000. First, the D5200 does not have an autofocus motor built into the camera body, so it will not be compatible with the full range of (old school) Nikon lenses, while the D7100 does posses the motor. And speaking of “focus”, the D7100 is capable of micro adjustments to correct for front or back-focus problems on lenses, while the D5200 is not.

As should be obvious from the images above, the D5200 has an articulated LCD screen, which some people find helpful for ground-level shots and video but others find a breakage hazard or amateurish. The D7100, on the other hand, has a slightly larger LCD at 3.2 instead of 3.0 diagonal inches.

Finally, if you are interested in video, the D7100 has been given a headphone jack for monitoring audio while you shoot. The jack is absent in the D5200 (and D7000).

Which to Buy?

The Nikon D5200 is a great camera, and I’d recommend it for most amateur photographers except for those who need superior flash capabilities.

To summarize, you should buy the D5200 if you:

  • want a great, all-around camera
  • shoot primarily with natural light or studio strobes
  • have smaller hands, or need the lightest body while maintaining high performance
  • need an articulated LCD screen for video or photos

Buy the D7100 if you:

  • are hard on your equipment and need a more durable body
  • use flash for action or fill and need high-speed sync
  • use Nikon’s CLS and want to use the built-in command module
  • have first-rate lenses and shoot images that depend on the sharpest detail
  • shoot macro (or other focus critical work) and need to make micro adjustments to your lenses
  • shoot a lot of video and want a simple headphone jack on your camera

For the sake of simplicity I’ve tried to focus on only the differences that, in my experience, will actually be important. There are, of course, numerous differences between the two cameras, though, and some features may be more important to particular photographers.
If you think that I’ve left out something important, please feel free to let me know.

Please Comment!

If you have additional questions or comments, please let me know, below. I’ll do what I can to answer questions and clear up any confusion.

Finally, if you have found this article useful, please support us by following one of our links if you decide to buy a camera. It will cost you nothing, but will help support additional independent, unbiased comparisons such as this. You can buy from Amazon here for the D5200 and D7100, or B&H Photo here for the D5200 and D7100.

  1. Further details and measurements can be found on DigicamDB.
  2. See this DxO Mark article for further details.
  3. If you don’t know why cross-type points are so important, I recommend watching the first half of our Photography Notes video
  4. with the most recent firmware upgrade. Originally, the 7D also shot about 15 RAW frames before filling the buffer

201
Leave a Reply

avatar
89 Comment threads
112 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
89 Comment authors
zachnouman amjadSandy TrandJoeRechelle Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
gui3415
Guest
gui3415

soy ex fotógrafo técnico, poseo fuelles,duplicador de negativos, lentes macros de la linea nikon F y microscopio con accesorio para nikon F.
Pregunto: con una nikon d5200 como es con mi viejo sistema en la compatibilidad de dichos lentes y accesorios desde ya le estoy agradecido por su opinion

Ask Burlefot
Guest
Ask Burlefot

I’m considering either the D5200 or D7100. I’ leaning towards the D5200 as the D7100 won’t mean that much reduction in bulk compared to my D600. However, when I believe I have made up my mind I’m getting more uncertain about the importance of this advantage since they use the same lenses and I’m worried that they won’ balance that well on the smaller body. My hands are not that big, but the D7100 are easily the better camera to hold. Also anadvantage with the better battery life. All the other smaller systems camera I have tried doesn’t have a battery that lasts a whole day.

salvador
Guest
salvador

gracias a sus consejos pude comprar nikon d5200. La pregunta es si puedo usar mis viejas fotocelulas para comandar un flash a distancia como relleno del flash incorporado, se puede usar u flash en la zapata de la maquina anulando el incorporado

Andrew
Guest
Andrew

Hi,

Great write up. I’m fairly new to photography and have a couple of questions. The type of photography I’m interested in is;
– snaps of the family
– landscapes
– to a lesser extent, sports photography.
I just cant decide between the D5200 and D7100. I think I’m leaning towards the D7100 for the size and the few extra features. As I’m fairly new some people point me towards the entry level cameras, but I want something I can grow in to. I don’t want to get something then find it’s not enough for me in 12 months time. What is your opinion for what I want to capture? Also, what lenses would you recommend for everyday use and for landscapes? Some people say there are better options than the 18-105mm VR that comes in the kit. Basically to buy the body only and the lenses separately. What are your thoughts on this also?

I appreciate your time.
Regards
Andrew

Kiden
Guest
Kiden

Hi Matthew,

I’m planning to buy either D5200 or D7100. I’m very skinny person that my hands get shaky when holding a very heavy camera such as my dad’s Canon 5D. So D5200 is preferable for me. However, after reading your reviews I think I go for D7100 because it has good features than the D5200. I love taking pictures of just about anything and wanted to go pro. I have a D60 and I’m quite disappointed with the result eventhough it’s lightweight. I prefer taking pictures using my dad’s 5D because of its sharpness and the focus is good but the only disadvantage is the weight.

So I’m in between of choosing this 2. Either I go for the lightweight but not much features and cheaper or the heavy one with so good features but expensive.

Which would you recommend for me?

Oh and sometimes I like to take videos. Which of these 2 are best on video recording?

Mj Ces
Guest

I’m glad I saw your post. Your comparison of the D5200 and D7100 is very helpful for a very confused amateur like myself. The best among those I’ve read so far as it helps me with my decision. Thanks!

Mark
Guest
Mark

Well done!! I always purchase a bit more than I’m comfortable spending and seem to be happy with my purchase most of the time. Purchasing the D7100 will make me go hmmmmm, do I really need this? Buying a D600 would give me cotton mouth and sweaty palms so I’d reluctantly purchase the D7100 knowing thatI should be getting the D5200 But will be happier with D7100. You can buy the D7100 body at ajrichies for $884.00, I think BestBuy will price match that. Reading great articles like this always helps ease the sticker shock and reassure me in my decisions, thanks.

Carolina
Guest
Carolina

Mathew,
Great overall review!
I would love to receive your feedback about the best camera when you need to take product photos indoors or outdoors. I also love to take photos for my kids.
I love the fact that the D5200 is light and compact. However, I want to purchase a good camera for product shots.
I was not sure if the flash will be an issue for photos indoors or outdoors.
Thank you, Carolina

Erik Maes
Guest
Erik Maes

Hi Matthew,

In January I bought a D5200 with a Nikkor 18-200 lens and ever since I’ve had mixed feelings about my purchase (thanks for your great advice in a previous posting btw). On many occasions the camera produces great and crystal sharp pictures, but far too often I’m disappointed by the results I get. Most recent case was a series of pictures I made this weekend of my children running around in the garden and not a single picture was well focussed (okay, except a few maybe).

The question I’ve been asking myself is: why? Are my expectations of the camera just unrealistically high and should I have gotten a more high-end model, is it the lens, or is it the guy pushing the button (me thus). As the D5200 focussing qualities are praised in every review, I’m tempted by option 3. Settings were full auto, centre single point AF and continuous high speed shooting. Pictures were taken outdoors on a sunny afternoon. On the centre single point AF: for some reason I have little faith in the 39-point dynamic-area AF. Every time I’ve tried that that mode I felt that the camera most of the time didn’t select the point that I felt it should. Maybe also linked to my first-focussing-then-framing style dating from the analogue days.

So basically my question comes down to the following: when you were testing the D5200, did you leave in full auto mode or did you have to do something extra to come to good focussing results?

Many thanks in advance for your answer
Kind regards
Erik

chad
Guest
chad

got the D7000 in Jan. 2013 and now in august i have close to 9,000 shutter actions and zero issue love the camera i am wondering if nikon will be putting the D7100 on sale or the D600 on sale at christmas time if so that would be a great time to buy one get a tamron 17-50mm F/2.8 lens or a prime lens to see what that sensor can do its amazing

Michael
Guest
Michael

Hi Mathew,

Thank you for your review. I’m planning to take pictures of birds and animals in action and shutter speed can be very important to be able to capture and freeze the moment in action. D5200 delivers half the speed but what does it mean in practical real terms? If I need to take a shot of a fast flying bird will D5200 be able to capture the moment or will the image be not clear?

Another question is about durability. I live in Africa and it is very dusty here no matter where you go. Does D7100 body gives that extra protection against moisture and dust as opposed to D5200?

Thank you in advance for your comments.

Michael

robin
Guest
robin

hi, i want to take only personal photographs and for friends and occasions. would be the nikon d5200 a good one? or the sony a65?

amatuer
Guest
amatuer

Hello there.
I am amateur about photography. I want to get one level up and from my IXUS 100 IS want to buy a dslr.
Mainly I am taking pics of nature(plants, insects animals or just beautiful areas) or family photos.
I once saw some macrophotographic pictures and loved em.
So I wan to buy a dslr and I am between d5200 and d7100(tho is a bit expensive). What do you recommend?
Do I need an extra lens for macrophotography or the one on the kit will do (18-105).
Or as an alternative buy the d3200 with more lens.
Thanks a lot.

Mark
Guest
Mark

I recently purchased the D7100 and had the same dilemma as you. I am very happy with the D7100 and though is a bit pricier I believe that I won’t outgrow it in a year. I have some samples here if you’d like to check them out (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrcranny/) All of the picture of the car show were taken with the D7100 and a Tokina 11-16 f2.8 or a Nikon 35 f1.8. I’m not really sure how the 18-105 performs but it’s my opinion that lenses with such a wide range won’t perform as well as a lens in the range of the Nikon 35-70 f2.8 which can be had on ebay for $200-300 and produce professional quality images. Just my opinion and I’m by no means a great photographer just wanted to chime in.

Mike
Guest

Question!!

I am at stand still and I don’t know which camera to get for the things I want to do. I don’t know if I should get the 5200, 7000 or 7100. The type of photography I want to do is landscape and night photography (stars). I’ve had a Nikon D60 before and I want to upgrade, but I don’t know which camera will be the best for what I want to achieve. I know all have the “Bulb” mode, but my fear (which I thought applies to lower end camera 5200 or D60) is that when I take a star shot (not the streaks) it will be noisy. I’ve attempted at this a few times and it was so noises that “purple” vignette started to appear and it was grainy or nosey. So to avoid all this which is the best camera for me? Can any one help? The camera will purely be used for outdoor photography (sunsets, Long stream silky water shots, Star shots, and some videos on my travels) and it’s one I want to keep for a while, but to achieve the results I want.

Overall I’ve been leaning between the 7000 and 7100 but I heard the major difference is the mega pixels? Are these the right camera to jump from a Nikon D60 to achieve the type of shot I want to do?

-Thanks!

RJ
Guest
RJ

I just have a couple of day left to decide between the Nikon D5200 and Nikon D7200, probably I will be willing to spend $1500 maximum including lens. I know nothing about DSLR, except for what have been able to read the last week days or so. Since I do not want to spend more money on lens anytime soon after this purchase, these are my questions.
Would the D5200 with a ~$700 lens take better picture that D7200 with the Kit lens?
Which lens would you recommend of for the D5200?
My reason to get one of these 2 cameras would be to take pictures of my 9 month child as he grow up, and also potential create some semiprofessional musical videos targeting the YouTube audience.

Thanks for you help!

Jack
Guest

Hi,
i’ve just discovered your website and I really like this article, finally a well written, not too in depth but straight to the point comparison between two cameras.

I’m an amateur enthusiast who is seriously planning on upgrading to a DSLR from my already excellent Sony RX100. I’ve been looking for weeks into reviews of entry level DSLR and I’m getting closer and closer to my final decision. The Nikon D5200 seems the perfect camera for me. However how do you think it stands compared to a Sony SLT 65/77?

Cheers

Steve Solomon
Guest

Hi Laura.
I was on the fence between the D5200 and the D7000 series (specifically the D7100). Being on a tight budget as well, I opted for the D5200 with better glass than the kit lens (I have the Nikkor 16-85 and the Nikkor 35 f/1.8). Both these lenses are outstanding, and very sharp! Check out my images when you get a chance, and you’ll see that this kit produces supberb image quality, likely better than the older D7000 and on par with the more expensive D7100. Granted, the D7000 range has a few more “Pro” features such as metal build, top LCD panel, High Speed Sync, Flash Commander Mode, etc., but it comes with somewhat larger and heavier bodies. Life’s a trade-off! Me? I opted for a lighter (yet still robust) body with articulating LCD monitor, and exceptional image quality, likely the best APS-C image quality on the market right now. Good luck!

Linda
Guest
Linda

I am looking to upgrade from a D70 and I use 70-200 f4.5-5.6. I am primarily looking for something that will allow me to take good action shots indoors (ie: wrestling). What do you recommend D5200 or D7100?(keeping my current glass – my budget is relatively limited)?

Laura
Guest
Laura

Hi there
I’m a photography student upgrading from the D3000 range, looking possibly to further study photography after school. Photography is also a hobby of mine and I’d like a better camera for all shooting. I’d love to follow it as a career path, into professional photography, but I can’t afford the pro range yet! Is the difference in price worth getting the D7000 as opposed to the D5200? Does the mega pixel difference really matter, if I don’t have the super expensive lenses yet to maximize it? I’m assuming that the D7000 range is superior to the D5000, just as the D5000 range is superior to that of the D3000. Because of your comments about the flash and such as well as other research, I am swayed towards the D7000 range…. I was wondering what your recommendation would be please? Thank you

trixie
Guest
trixie

are you going to review the d7100 vs the 70d?

Lesley Hathway
Guest
Lesley Hathway

I have a Nikon D50 and would like to upgrade to either the D5200 or the D7100 or any other Nikon in this price range. I usually take Landscapes and Wildlife and would like to try astro photography as I have 3 telescopes. What would be your recommendation.

Steve P
Guest
Steve P

Thanks very much for this useful comparison. For me, one of the most important differentiators between the two models is the 100% pentaprism viewfinder in the D7100 (and D7000). It has always baffled me that manufacturers
provide anything less at the point where the camera and photographer connect, even on so-called budget models.
Cheers, Steve.

Kyndel
Guest
Kyndel

Very fine review, but the LCD in the D5200 will problably do it for me.

I have the D5100 and love the LCD.

EVERY camera should have that – also the pros (I have the D3x and miss it there) – it is so convinient for shooting in strange angles and on tripod, and it is possibly to make it “strong” even for pro work.

For video it is nearly mandatory.

Nima
Guest
Nima

Hi, thanks for the great article. I am particularly interested in HDR photography, can you please compare these cameras for that purpose?

Janina
Guest
Janina

Thanks a lot, this comparison is what I needed for my final decision.

Odusseus
Guest
Odusseus

Hi,
Thanks for the article it was very clear, better than all of what I have sen before on the web.
I had two questions.
Would you say that there is a difference in the video mode between the 7100 and 5200? I used the 7000 for video and was quite satisfied with it. Should I expect something equivalent with the 5200 (or better?).
And finally, with the 50/60fps video mode, could you say that we could shoot proper slow motion?

Thanks in advance.

Stephen
Guest
Stephen

I’m trying to decide between these exact two cameras. I use to shoot professionally 20 years ago when i was young. Digital cameras were just beginning to come out then. I don’t have any old lenses to use. I want a fresh start with a new camera. The camera will be used primary to take pictures of my girlfriend using natural light or lighting i control in the studio. I like things simple. Also what is the maximum size SD card i can use? I have 128 GB cards, but the Macintosh only supports 32 GB cards. DO you have a recommendation for a zoom lens?

ram
Guest
ram

Now the price of D7000 is same as d5200 . Is d7000 better than d5200?

Donal McEnroe
Guest
Donal McEnroe

Thanks for the very relevant comparisons between the D5200 and D7100. The D5200 suits my needs (and budget) much better!

Gee
Guest
Gee

By far one of the BEST photog reviews I have ever read. Completely succint and relevant to all my concerns.

Angus Shepherd
Guest
Angus Shepherd

Thanks for a great article. You’ve introduced ideas that matter to a discussion rather than focusing upon the fine details that really won’t make a jot of difference to most peoples’ camera skills.
Little things that are overlooked elsewhere include the internal/lens-drive motor issue which would make a couple of my lenses redundant.
And whether it has Wi-Fi or not does little to make me choose one over another (Almost an argument on another page).
I guess when it comes down to speed of achieving focus, that’s mainly with the lens.
Might be the 7000 for me!

Alaa
Guest
Alaa

do the D7100 have faster AF than the D5200 or both the same speed?
for photographing a running horse toward me like in this photo
<img src=”http://sphotos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/555288_365101180212764_921836109_n.jpg”>

Jeff Pulver
Guest
Jeff Pulver

Great article. You did a great job of netting out the key differences in a tight, easy to absorb summary. Very helpful, thanks!

John
Guest

Hi Matthew,
Just so that I am sure about that… you are saying that the D5200 blows away the Canon T4i right?

trixie
Guest
trixie

i’m really disappointed in nikon making the d5200 without flash fill. i feel i really need the articulating screen but also need flash fill. do you have any suggestions?

PeterS
Guest
PeterS

Thanks for this great article. I have spent several hours at various photo shops in my home town (Edmonton, Canada) comparing these two, using an existing Nikon lens. Interesting, the feedback I repeatedly got was that I should go with the 7100 as it was a “better” camera (there were lots of reasons why, but that was the bottom line). However, having small hands and not liking the weight, my gut told me that the 5200 was the better camera for me, and with photos I took at the store, there was very little difference I could see between pictures I took with these two cameras, except when I zoomed in and then dramatically cropped the photos and expanded them (I took along my own card to let me compare photos at home, and I have to say the store staff were excellent at allowing me to play around and give advice – shout out to McBain Camera). Thus, for most of the photographers who will use these cameras I will agree that we will never notice differences in image quality between them. Thus, I am off to get the 5200 and am really grateful you gave such clear advice

Ryan
Guest
Ryan

I just spent a couple of hours reading through the articles and links on this site and all I can say is thank you!! for all of the helpful details and explanations. I’ve never used a DSLR camera before but always been obsessive about taking photos in my compact digital camera…now I’m receiving a DSLR camera of my choice as a graduation present and have been almost overwhelmed by the possibilities as a beginner. If I normally would just be taking photos of scenery/architecture/social activities, as a beginner would the D5200 be too overwhelming as my first DSLR? And what would be the best lens that I would want to buy for these purposes? I’ve read some of your lenses links but I’d like just a quality lens for a great value, nothing super expensive that professionals use. I wouldn’t be worried about having a great macro lens as I can’t imagine I’d be taking very many extreme close-up shots. Money is not an option but from what I’d be using it for the D7100 seems excessive vs the D5200. Thanks!

Edwin
Guest

Hi Mathew.
i just got my nikon d5200 and plans to buy a nikkor 70-300 manual lens do you think its a got idea? Thanks

Juliet
Guest
Juliet

Hi Matthew,

I’m an amateur photographer where I do it mainly as a hobby. I’ve been using a Nikon D3000 for two years and finally decided I wanted to upgrade to a nicer camera. I do have a budget but I can’t decide between the D5200 and D7100 when it comes to what I’ll be using them for. I’ll be doing a lot of portrait photoshoots mostly and I go to conventions where I take hall photos of people in costumes or do private shoots. I also want to occasionally take some video but nothing too extreme like a cinematic endeavor. A lot of conventions have bad lighting unless we’re outside (and the sun conveniently is out). I currently have a Nikon 50mm f/1.8D and if I get the D5200 I would have to get a new 50mm for I am done with not having autofocus. But if I get the D7100 I get to keep the lens I currently have, and save money on future lens that don’t have AF-S. Overall, buying one or the other is about the same (with the D7100 being $200 more) and I just can’t decide on what to pick for the final plunge.

Any suggestions? (And if you possibly have a lens recommendation for conventions that would be great too)

Thanks!

Erik Maes
Guest
Erik Maes

Hi Matthew,

First of all congratulations with your excellent review. It is by far the most useful review on the D5200 I’ve read so far. It contains technical details but what’s most important to me is that it’s down to earth. Why bother about differences between 2 cameras that you will only notice in lab conditions…

I myself finally bought the D5200 with a Nikkor 18-200mm lens. The other choice would have been the D7000 (when I bought my camera last Jan the D7100 was not yet out). But after long deliberation I made for myself the conclusion that I would probably never use the extra features that the D7000 offers over the D5100 and that a lower weight and more recent components were more important.

But after having shot some 2000 or 3000 pictures I have mixed feelings about the camera. In many cases my D5200 produces incredibly sharp images, both indoors as outdoors. But at the same time, I often have pictures that are (slightly) out of focus, or definitely do not have the sharpness I expects from a DSLR, although I’m absolutely sure that the focussing point is exactly on my subject.

Did you ever come across focussing issues when testing the D5200? I’m not sure if it’s camera-related (that is having a bad body) or user-related (me doing something wrong). But anyhow this is how I typically focus: set focussing to single-point AF (center), point at the subject and half-press the shutter button and finally do the composition.

In fact I should take it back to my camera-dealer but I’d be also very much interested in any tips/views you might have.

Kind regards
Erik

Mick
Guest
Mick

G’day Matthew

Very inexperienced with DSLR (although I have an older Olympus) but after reading your great review I have decided to buy a D5200 both for photos and occasional movie function.
At this stage I am looking for an all round lens and would appreciate your advice regarding which of the standard lens packages (18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR NIKKOR or 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR ED NIKKOR) would be the better choice.
Have also considered buying a Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S separately.

Thanks for your help
Mick

Steve Solomon
Guest

Mick, Along with Matthew’s fine comments, as a current D5200 user, I can attest to the very high quality (sharpness, detail rendition, color) of these 2 Nikkors: the 16-85 f/3.5-5.6, and the 35mm f/1.8. I think the 16-85 is probably the sharpest of the zooms mentioned thus far, although obviously not nearly as sharp as the wonderful 35mm f/1.8. For sample images taken with the D5200 and these fine optics, please check out my stock photography site. Thank you! Steve

Elisabeth
Guest
Elisabeth

Yes, I second that about the 16-85mm 3.5-5.6. I just got it as a replacement to a defective refurbished 18-105mm. The problem with the 18-105 was with the auto focus motor. I could still manually focus it, so I did many studio still life shots with it. The 16-85 is much better quality. The build is a bit better and seems to be better corrected.

diuc
Guest
diuc

Let me also chime in with a lens recommendation: the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM. It’s a GREAT lens for the price, and well worth the price difference to the kit lenses.

I have the Sigma, plus a 35mm f1.8 (which I very rarely use anymore) and a Tamron AF 60mm f/2.0 for portraits.

Steve Solomon
Guest

diuc,
Yes, the Sigma 17-50 “sounds” like a fine choice, except that in my case, I wanted that slightly wider view afforded by the 16-85 Nikkor, albeit with the slower maximum aperture. Plus, I just like the 100% compatibility and build quality of these Nikkors, although I admit to never having used this particular Sigma lens. That said, for an ultra-wide option however, I have been considering the Sigma 8-16 for Nikon, as no one else makes one, and I’ve read some good reviews on it. Thanks, Steve