Sony A7C: the Ideal Hiking Camera?

The Sony A7C camera is, in many ways, a blending of two current product lines using the Sony E-mount: it has most of the internals of the two-year-old full frame A7iii, but a body more closely resembling the APS-C A6600.

As such, the A7C should not be seen as a replacement for the A7iii. Sony claims that this camera is the first in a new product line. In other words, the A7iii and its successors will continue using more traditional ergonomics with a larger, centered viewfinder and more external controls, while the A7C will cater to people looking for full frame in a smaller form factor.

Given that the A7C retains most of the characteristics of the A7iii, how does the camera fit in the Sony lineup?

Bernard Dery | Light And Matter

Mainly because of its side-swiveling LCD screen, many people immediately associate the A7C with vlogging. This association makes sense: the swivel mechanism does present an improvement for vloggers when compared to the one found on the A7iii (which swivels towards the top). This allows the use of an external, hot-shoe mounted microphone with the screen facing forward.

However, there is another market segment that is ideally served by the A7C: hikers and, by extension, travelers.

Catering to a Hiker’s Needs

Bernard Dery | Light And Matter Sony A7C attached to a Peak Design Capture Clip

Whether they go out for a few hours or a few days, hikers always put a lot of emphasis on volume and weight. A hiker carries food, clothing, tools. A photographer will probably wish to carry a tripod, a few lenses, batteries, accessories. All of this increases the total weight which must be carried by the hiker.

In this regard, the advantages of the Sony A7C are numerous. There are other small cameras on the market, many of which come from Sony’s APS-C lineup. In many cases, an APS-C camera will be sufficient for hiking photographers, but others, and in particular landscape photographers, will wish to take advantage of the increased dynamic range offered by full frame sensors.

The A7C also uses Sony’s SteadyShot image stabilization system. There is exactly one smaller full frame camera currently on the market (the Sigma FP). That camera lacks image stabilization and its ergonomics are, to put it mildly, a matter of compromise. The Sony A7C does not offer the deeper grip and number of external controls of a larger camera, but it does at least offer an actual grip and a level of comfort comparable with other mirrorless cameras on the market.

The A7C (like its A7iii sibling) also improves on the battery life when compared with previous Sony mirrorless cameras, and with the mirrorless market as a whole. With a rating of 740 shots, it will minimize the need to carry numerous spares.

Finally, the A7C is weather resistant. Again, the camera is not class-leading, and certainly does not offer the level of protection of, say, a Pentax K-1 DSLR. Still, the A7C will be able to withstand splashes and exposure to rain and sprays.

Bernard Dery | Light And Matter

In short, the Sony A7C checks most of the boxes for a hiker’s ideal camera: a compact, light, full-frame body, with good ergonomics, in-body image stabilization, and weather resistance.

A Body and a Lens

Bernard Dery | Light And Matter The A7C can ship with the compact 28-60mm lens

Saving a few hundred grams with a compact camera body becomes almost irrelevant if the camera is coupled with a large and heavy lens. This is why I think it made perfect sense to launch the A7C with the FE 28-60mm lens.

Thanks to its retractable design, the FE 28-60mm lens becomes tiny when not in use. In this, it fits perfectly with the design ethos of the A7C. Luckily, it doesn’t stop there.

Bernard Dery | Light And Matter Despite its limited zoom range, the 28-60mm is a versatile lens, especially coupled with the A7C

A compact lens wouldn’t be useful if it weren’t able to deliver strong optical performance. The good news is that the 28-60mm delivers pleasing results, well above general expectations for a kit lens. Sharpness is high, especially in the center, and contrast is well tuned, increasing the perceived sharpness. Bokeh with a relatively slow lens is never ground-breaking, but the lens still manages smooth out-of-focus blur without disturbing highlights.

The lens is weak for distortion and vignetting, but the camera takes care of these effects automatically. The 28-60mm also resists flare and ghosting well, which will be particularly relevant for landscapes. It also focuses quickly and silently, and excels at subject tracking.

The lens is also not particularly fast, with a maximum aperture of f/4 at the wide end rapidly climbing to f/5.6 at the tele end, and 28mm is not a particularly wide focal length. In other words, the 28-60 is somewhat of a compromise. Users who want a wider or faster zoom will have to look elsewhere and live with the bulk. Users who wish to keep their camera setup small will accept those compromises, and benefit from a lens with solid optical performance.

Other Lens Options

The beauty of the current FE-mount lineup is that it offers many options for compact primes, several of which come with weather sealing.

The A7c is easy to carry on-location
Bernard Dery | Light And Matter The A7c is easy to carry on-location

Sony offers three lenses that I consider compatible with the spirit of the A7C: the FE 28mm f/2, Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA, and the FE 50mm f/1.8. Only the 50mm lacks weather sealing.

Tamron offers a superb trio of lenses which all share the same external dimensions, the same f/2.8 aperture and are all weather sealed: the 20mm, 24mm and 35mm (all of which cost $250 or less). In fact, even their zoom lenses for mirrorless are designed to be lightweight, and the 17-28 f/2.8 and 28-75 f/2.8 are very well regarded (see our reviews here and here).

If you don’t mind manual focus, Laowa offers several wide angle lenses. Sadly, none are weather sealed, but some do come with the small size that will be desirable for hikers, namely the 11mm f/4.5, and 15mm f/4 macro.

Samyang/Rokinon also produce several relevant products. Their 18mm f/2.8, 24mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2.8 and 45mm f/1.8 are all of interest, and their 75mm f/1.8, while longer than the other lenses on this list, is compact for a short tele and will help extend the reach of a travel kit. Sadly, none are weather sealed.

Sigma offers some interesting product, in particular their newly announced “I” series, composed of the 24mm f/3.5, 35mm f/2, 45mm f/2.8 and to some extent, 65mm f/2 (this one is longer and heavier than most).

All of these lenses pair nicely with the A7C camera and the FE 28-60mm lens. They are all compatible with the concept of a compact, high-quality kit for hiking and travel.

Conclusion

Bernard Dery | Light And Matter Sony A7C with FE 28-60mm

With the introduction of the A7C, Sony offers a compelling choice for hikers, travelers, or anyone wishing to travel light. The camera and its accompanying kit lens appear to have been tailored with this demographic in mind. The compromises and included features correspond to what a hiker will desire.

Thanks to the numerous options available on the full frame E-mount, the A7C integrates seamlessly in the lineup and offers an option worthy of consideration.

Are you considering the Sony A7C for your travels or hikes? Let us know in the comments!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tara

I specifically bought this camera and the 85 mm Sony lens for an upcoming hiking trip to Scotland- weather resistance was key, I wanted some close ups of sheep and highland cows- so opted for the 85mm, surprised you didn’t mention that as an optional lens. I appreciate the review!

Tara

I’m also taking the kit lens- just added the 85 :)

Anthony MakD

Hi Bernard,

You replied to one of my comments on Facebook and I checked out your smugmug page and arrived here. Seems we have a common interest in minimising the size/weight of our gear for hiking and landscape photography.

Since my last hike up and down a mountain in Japan (only 1100m), I decided my pack (guessing 10kg) was way too heavy.

I’ve been eyeing the A7c, but I’m thinking of dropping down to APS-c for the following reasons. Would be interesting to see what you think of them:

1) I currently use an A7r, which at 50% more megapixels and 45g less weight than the A7c makes it equally portable but potentially more powerful. It uses an old sensor though, so I don’t know how much better the A7c files would look.

Any idea?

According to DXOmark, the dynamic range of the A7c is 14.7 Evs compared to 14.1 (A7r), so I’m guessing IQ differences will be minimal?

2) The weight problem comes down to FF lenses. Even with >f/4 they’re still big and heavy. The big advantage of APS-c is not their small body size but rather their smaller sensor facilitates greater DoF for the same focal length & aperture meaning equivalent spec-ed lenses are smaller.

3) If (2) is correct, then what will I lose by dropping to a smaller sensor? DXOmark scores the A6500 & A6300 with a dynamic range of 13.7 Evs, so a stop less than the A7c, but only half a stop from my A7r. I think I can live with this, how about you?

4) Am I correct in thinking that given the A7c and A6500/6300 have the same megapixels therefore they can print the same size? If true, then the decision comes down to weight vs 1-stop of light, but if mounted on a tripod then is the latter really an issue?

If all the above make sense, then here’s what I’m thinking of switching to for travel/landscape:

1) GR iii in my pocket as an EDC for travel.
2) A6300/6500 with Sony G 70-350mm + 10-18mm + mid-zoom
3) Plus a fast 50mm prime (FF equiv.) for portraits.

Thoughts?

Anthony

Anthony MakD

P.s. one other idea: the A7r4 with its 61MP sensor will allow cropping but with enough pixels left over for larger prints. Therefore, I could swap my 100-400 for a x-200mm lens.

jayson

yes proud a7c owner here! thanks for the awesome review